Thursday, December 15, 2005
The Ann Coulter Beat Down Session
I considered a full-blown Coulter beat down session, but to put it bluntly, this twitching, foaming freak refutes herself.
Reagan took an approach to the Cold War dramatically different from any other US President. To wit, he thought we should win. This was a fresh concept. At the time, it was widely ridiculed as a dangerous alteration of US policy. Only after it worked was Reagan's dangerous foreign policy recast as merely a continuation of the policies of his predecessors.
In Coulter’s demented worldview there were no anti-communist presidents before Reagan. Apparently, all of our presidents before him thought we should lose the Cold War. Eisenhower putting missiles in Turkey? Never happened. Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis? Never happened. Nixon engaging China and further isolating the Soviet Union? Never happened.
Even if corners were cut, (Iran-Contra) was a brilliant scheme. There is no possibility that anyone in any Democratic administration would have gone to such lengths to fund anti-Communist forces. When Democrats scheme from the White House, it's to cover up the President's affair with an intern. When Republicans scheme, it's to support embattled anti-Communist freedom fighters sold out by the Democrats.
Indeed. The Iran-Contra Affair was a “brilliant scheme.” It destroyed the president’s approval ratings, forced the resignation of many of his staffers and cabinet members, led to their indictments, and, most importantly, funded a motley collection of terrorists trained by the CIA to target civilians and destroy the infrastructure of a third-world nation in flagrant violation of international law, as the UN ruled.
By the way, the Sandistas weren’t Communists. They never said they were, they never aspired to be. And if getting funding from Communists makes a nation a Communist nation, then I guess the U.S. of A. is a Communist nation because China loans us billions of dollars every year.
The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites.
Not even going to bother with this one.
(Sheryl) Crow explained that the 'best way to solve problems is to not have enemies.' War solves that problem too: We won't have any enemies because we're going to kill them.
The subtlety of Coulter’s foreign policy is on full display here.
Liberals said Reagan was dangerous and his rhetoric scary. They ridiculed him as an idiot for believing the Soviet Union could be toppled. They opposed him on every front -- strengthening the military, aiding and arming anti-Communist rebels around the world, invading Grenada, preparing to win a nuclear war, building a nuclear shield, and waging a spiritual crusade against Soviet totalitarianism. Reagan said the Soviet Union was an evil empire and we would prevail. He called the ball, the shot, and the pocket, and he won the game. But now we're supposed to believe he was lucky. Liberals lie about Reagan's victory because when Reagan won the Cold War, he proved them wrong on everything they had done and said throughout the Cold War.
I love the “Reagan won the Cold War” stuff. It actually brings a smile to my face to read that every time I do.
The Great Satan is wearying of this reverse hegemony, in which little pipsqueak nations try to impose their pipsqueak values on us. Aren't we the ones who should be arrogantly oppressing countries that unaccountably do not have the death penalty?
Again, Coulter foreign policy on full display here.
Gore said foreigners are not worried about 'what the terrorist networks are going to do, but about what we're going to do.' Good. They should be worried. They hate us? We hate them. Americans don't want to make Islamic fanatics love us. We want to make them die. There's nothing like horrendous physical pain to quell anger. Japanese Kamikazes pilots hated us once, too. A couple of well-aimed nuclear weapons got their attention. Now they are gentle little lambs.
In the corporeal world, international law is whatever the United States and Great Britain say it is.
More Coulter foreign policy.
Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now.
I love this quote. I have actually cracked a smile. Unambiguous bigotry right here.
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
Dead civilians? No problem!
The Democrats have no actual policy proposals of their own unless constant carping counts as a policy.
Simply, laughably false.
I know Jesus Christ died for my sins, and that's all I really need to know.
LOL! Whew! The tent of Christianity is getting mighty broad these days, isn’t it?
Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours.
Woah, woah, woah. God never said anything about rape!
There are a lot of bad republicans; there are no good democrats.
An insult to the intelligence of every American.
[Bill Clinton] masturbates in the sinks.
This is political commentary?
I think [Whitewater]'s going to prevent the First Lady [Hillary Clinton] from running for Senate.
Dead on prediction there, Ann.
“I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal ... [The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start.”
Yup. That gives you an idea of where she is, politically speaking.
People like you caused us to lose the war." (to a disabled Vietnam Veteran)
LOL!
I think [women] should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote. No, they all have to give up their vote, not just, you know, the lady clapping and me. The problem with women voting -- and your Communists will back me up on this -- is that, you know, women have no capacity to understand how money is earned.
women are "not as bright" as men. [09/23/04, Hannity & Colmes]
How is this unabashed sexist a guest on CNN? Even FOX? WHAT IS SHE DOING ON ANY MAJOR NETWORK IN THIS COUNTRY?
Reagan took an approach to the Cold War dramatically different from any other US President. To wit, he thought we should win. This was a fresh concept. At the time, it was widely ridiculed as a dangerous alteration of US policy. Only after it worked was Reagan's dangerous foreign policy recast as merely a continuation of the policies of his predecessors.
In Coulter’s demented worldview there were no anti-communist presidents before Reagan. Apparently, all of our presidents before him thought we should lose the Cold War. Eisenhower putting missiles in Turkey? Never happened. Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis? Never happened. Nixon engaging China and further isolating the Soviet Union? Never happened.
Even if corners were cut, (Iran-Contra) was a brilliant scheme. There is no possibility that anyone in any Democratic administration would have gone to such lengths to fund anti-Communist forces. When Democrats scheme from the White House, it's to cover up the President's affair with an intern. When Republicans scheme, it's to support embattled anti-Communist freedom fighters sold out by the Democrats.
Indeed. The Iran-Contra Affair was a “brilliant scheme.” It destroyed the president’s approval ratings, forced the resignation of many of his staffers and cabinet members, led to their indictments, and, most importantly, funded a motley collection of terrorists trained by the CIA to target civilians and destroy the infrastructure of a third-world nation in flagrant violation of international law, as the UN ruled.
By the way, the Sandistas weren’t Communists. They never said they were, they never aspired to be. And if getting funding from Communists makes a nation a Communist nation, then I guess the U.S. of A. is a Communist nation because China loans us billions of dollars every year.
The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites.
Not even going to bother with this one.
(Sheryl) Crow explained that the 'best way to solve problems is to not have enemies.' War solves that problem too: We won't have any enemies because we're going to kill them.
The subtlety of Coulter’s foreign policy is on full display here.
Liberals said Reagan was dangerous and his rhetoric scary. They ridiculed him as an idiot for believing the Soviet Union could be toppled. They opposed him on every front -- strengthening the military, aiding and arming anti-Communist rebels around the world, invading Grenada, preparing to win a nuclear war, building a nuclear shield, and waging a spiritual crusade against Soviet totalitarianism. Reagan said the Soviet Union was an evil empire and we would prevail. He called the ball, the shot, and the pocket, and he won the game. But now we're supposed to believe he was lucky. Liberals lie about Reagan's victory because when Reagan won the Cold War, he proved them wrong on everything they had done and said throughout the Cold War.
I love the “Reagan won the Cold War” stuff. It actually brings a smile to my face to read that every time I do.
The Great Satan is wearying of this reverse hegemony, in which little pipsqueak nations try to impose their pipsqueak values on us. Aren't we the ones who should be arrogantly oppressing countries that unaccountably do not have the death penalty?
Again, Coulter foreign policy on full display here.
Gore said foreigners are not worried about 'what the terrorist networks are going to do, but about what we're going to do.' Good. They should be worried. They hate us? We hate them. Americans don't want to make Islamic fanatics love us. We want to make them die. There's nothing like horrendous physical pain to quell anger. Japanese Kamikazes pilots hated us once, too. A couple of well-aimed nuclear weapons got their attention. Now they are gentle little lambs.
In the corporeal world, international law is whatever the United States and Great Britain say it is.
More Coulter foreign policy.
Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now.
I love this quote. I have actually cracked a smile. Unambiguous bigotry right here.
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
Dead civilians? No problem!
The Democrats have no actual policy proposals of their own unless constant carping counts as a policy.
Simply, laughably false.
I know Jesus Christ died for my sins, and that's all I really need to know.
LOL! Whew! The tent of Christianity is getting mighty broad these days, isn’t it?
Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours.
Woah, woah, woah. God never said anything about rape!
There are a lot of bad republicans; there are no good democrats.
An insult to the intelligence of every American.
[Bill Clinton] masturbates in the sinks.
This is political commentary?
I think [Whitewater]'s going to prevent the First Lady [Hillary Clinton] from running for Senate.
Dead on prediction there, Ann.
“I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don't need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal ... [The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start.”
Yup. That gives you an idea of where she is, politically speaking.
People like you caused us to lose the war." (to a disabled Vietnam Veteran)
LOL!
I think [women] should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote. No, they all have to give up their vote, not just, you know, the lady clapping and me. The problem with women voting -- and your Communists will back me up on this -- is that, you know, women have no capacity to understand how money is earned.
women are "not as bright" as men. [09/23/04, Hannity & Colmes]
How is this unabashed sexist a guest on CNN? Even FOX? WHAT IS SHE DOING ON ANY MAJOR NETWORK IN THIS COUNTRY?
# posted by BitterHarvest @ 10:37 AM 
